For most Product Managers, the "Product Tour" is a checkbox on a launch list. You build a linear walkthrough, point out the major features, and hope for the best.

But there’s a reason the "Skip" button is the most-clicked element in your onboarding. If your tour is static, you are giving a lecture to a user who just wants to get to work. To drive real activation, you need to move toward adaptive guidance—onboarding that reacts to what the user is doing in real-time.

‍

The Static Trap: Why Linear Walkthroughs Fail

Static tours are fixed sequences. They trigger on page load and follow a rigid "Next, Next, Next" logic. They assume every user is at the same skill level and has the exact same goal.

The problem is that these tours are intrusive. They interrupt the user’s momentum to explain features they might not need yet, which is the primary driver for high drop-off rates. A static tour is essentially a "forced march" through the UI.

We break down the anatomy of a static tour and why the lack of flexibility leads directly to "onboarding fatigue."

‍

This is not saying that static tours are bad by definition. There're many valid reasons when static product tours should be used. Such as:

• Employee onboarding
• Legal reasons
• New feature tours

‍

The Adaptive Pivot: Moving to Event-Based Guidance

Adaptive onboarding doesn't follow a rigid script; it follows the user. Instead of a fixed sequence, it uses event-driven triggers to offer help only when relevant.

• Wait for Interaction: Instead of showing step 2 because it follows step 1, an adaptive tour waits for the user to actually interact with the first element.
• Intent-Based: If a user performs an action out of order, the tour recognizes the event and adjusts, preventing redundant information.
• ‍Contextual Relevance: If a user performs an action early, the adaptive tour recognizes the "event" and automatically skips the redundant introductory steps.

See it in action:

‍

Why Adaptive Tours Don't Break

And we must not forget the technical aspect of onboarding tours.

One of the biggest "hidden costs" for PMs is onboarding debt. Static tours are brittle; if you move a button or change a CSS class, the tour breaks.

Adaptive guides are built to be resilient. Because they are often tied to user actions and events rather than just hard-coded coordinates, they survive product iterations much better.

‍

Static vs Adaptive: The Real Difference

Static onboarding asks:

What should we show users?

‍

Adaptive onboarding asks:

What does this specific user need right now?

‍

That’s not a cosmetic improvement. That’s a systems-level shift.

‍

Why This Matters for Modern SaaS

Products today are:

• Multi-role
• Multi-feature
• Frequently updated
• Behaviorally complex

Onboarding cannot be a linear experience in a nonlinear environment. If your tours don’t account for context, they will always feel disconnected.

And even a slight disconnect is enough for users to disengage.

‍

Final Takeaway

Static tours aren’t broken. They’re limited. They were designed for simpler products and predictable journeys.

‍

But modern onboarding requires something else:

• Context-aware guidance
• Behavior-driven progression
• Adaptive systems instead of fixed flows.

‍

Because onboarding shouldn’t be a script. It should be a response.

‍

Here is the full recording of the webinar for the deep dive into these frameworks:

‍